She listened to the proceedings through an interpreter, taking occasional drinks from a pink water bottle. Meng attended the hearing dressed in a short black dress and wearing an electronic tracking bracelet on her ankle. “The fact that he said it is problematic,” Peck said. This is an affront to what is fair, right, and just." “The requesting state has not acted in good faith. has subverted this process, has destroyed the integrity of the process,” said Peck. Peck said the “abhorrent nature of the president’s words” put a stain on the extradition proceedings and the Canadian justice system. His words amount to an abuse of process.” “These words cast a pall over these proceedings,” said Peck. Peck said Trump’s comments make it clear he hoped to use Meng as leverage in trade negotiations with China. “If I think it’s good for the country, if I think it’s good for what will be certainly the largest trade deal ever made – which is a very important thing – what’s good for national security – I would certainly intervene if I thought it was necessary,” Trump said at the time. It says Meng, 49, committed fraud by misleading the HSBC bank about the company’s business dealings in Iran.ĭefense lawyer Richard Peck pointed to a 2018 interview in which Trump was asked if he would be willing to intervene in Meng’s case if it would help secure a trade deal with China or aid U.S. accuses Huawei of using a Hong Kong shell company called Skycom to sell equipment to Iran in violation of U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |